Sumner carrying-cost risk
The carrying-cost risk in Sumner is 47/100, ranking #1,292 of 3,135 U.S. counties. Updated monthly and free to explore.
Carrying-cost risk
47/100
Ranks #1,292 of 3,135 U.S. counties, in the top 41%.
- vs. national median51/100Sumner is lower than the U.S. median
- vs. Tennessee median36/100Sumner is higher than the Tennessee median
Get an email when Sumner's market changes
Free. We email you when Sumner's crash-risk read moves between Low, Moderate, and Elevated. Unsubscribe any time.
See all 290+ metrics for Sumner
Forecasts, crash and climate risk, cap rate, taxes, and trend charts in one dashboard.
What carrying-cost risk means
Counties cheapest and least risky to own long-term, with the lowest blend of homeowners-insurance cost, climate-hazard exposure, and property-tax burden on Curb Report's Carrying-Cost Risk Index. Insurance and hazard figures are educational estimates for a typical home, not quotes.
Sumner carrying-cost risk: common questions
What is the carrying-cost risk in Sumner?
The carrying-cost risk in Sumner is 47/100, which ranks #1,292 of 3,135 U.S. counties. Curb Report updates this monthly and it is free to view.
Is the carrying-cost risk in Sumner above or below the national average?
Sumner is lower than the U.S. median of 51/100, putting it in the top 41% of U.S. counties.
How does Sumner compare with the rest of Tennessee?
Sumner is higher than the Tennessee median of 36/100.
What does carrying-cost risk mean?
Counties cheapest and least risky to own long-term, with the lowest blend of homeowners-insurance cost, climate-hazard exposure, and property-tax burden on Curb Report's Carrying-Cost Risk Index. Insurance and hazard figures are educational estimates for a typical home, not quotes.
Markets like Sumner
- York63 match
- Franklin53 match
- Benton49 match
- Weber48 match
- Mecklenburg47 match
- Bonneville45 match
- Rutherford44 matchCompare →
- Lincoln44 match
- Iredell42 match
- Cache42 match