Kane carrying-cost risk
The carrying-cost risk in Kane is 16/100, ranking #107 of 3,135 U.S. counties. Updated monthly and free to explore.
Carrying-cost risk
16/100
Ranks #107 of 3,135 U.S. counties, in the top 3%.
- vs. national median51/100Kane is lower than the U.S. median
- vs. Utah median16/100Kane is higher than the Utah median
Get an email when Kane's market changes
Free. We email you when Kane's crash-risk read moves between Low, Moderate, and Elevated. Unsubscribe any time.
See all 290+ metrics for Kane
Forecasts, crash and climate risk, cap rate, taxes, and trend charts in one dashboard.
What carrying-cost risk means
Counties cheapest and least risky to own long-term, with the lowest blend of homeowners-insurance cost, climate-hazard exposure, and property-tax burden on Curb Report's Carrying-Cost Risk Index. Insurance and hazard figures are educational estimates for a typical home, not quotes.
Kane carrying-cost risk: common questions
What is the carrying-cost risk in Kane?
The carrying-cost risk in Kane is 16/100, which ranks #107 of 3,135 U.S. counties. Curb Report updates this monthly and it is free to view.
Is the carrying-cost risk in Kane above or below the national average?
Kane is lower than the U.S. median of 51/100, putting it in the top 3% of U.S. counties.
How does Kane compare with the rest of Utah?
Kane is higher than the Utah median of 16/100.
What does carrying-cost risk mean?
Counties cheapest and least risky to own long-term, with the lowest blend of homeowners-insurance cost, climate-hazard exposure, and property-tax burden on Curb Report's Carrying-Cost Risk Index. Insurance and hazard figures are educational estimates for a typical home, not quotes.
Markets like Kane
- Lumpkin45 match
- Crook36 match
- Loudon33 match
- Moore28 match
- Washington27 match
- Idaho27 match
- Gilchrist27 match
- Mineral26 match
- Alamosa25 match
- Rio Grande25 match